Close
Notification:  
v2.2.1 Professional
Login
Loading
Wiki About this wiki Volume 1 Volume 2 Test Page Vol 1 - v053 - Errata Vol 1 - v053 - Aux Book Features Vol 1 - v053 - Alternative Format Vol 1 - v054 - Notes Vol 1 - v054 - Pages Vol 1 - v054 - New Paragraph Sources Vol 1 - v055 - The Delivery Method Vol 1 - v055 Notes Vol 1 - v056 Notes Vol 1 - v057 Notes Fundamental Images test -paste in table Test Buttons New Page New Page Where is the Password for Additional Features? Next Word Version FR Issues with TOC and Book Interleaving Dynamic Text Display Everywhere Very Large Books Book content mapping New Behavior Evolutionary News Microsoft Courier Literate Programming Currently Reading We're going to Mars - Mission to Mars 2 New Big Book Links Circular library Wiki Distribution The Mind's You Preservation in the Digital Age - REPRINT Introduction If Words were Flowers Foreword and | or Preface HyperTextopia and the Docuverse Chronology Time Quantum Self Reference print paragraphs of text in pseudo KANJI - Paul Haeberli - 1996 Hypertext that works Les Sous-Sols du Revolu Napoleon romance novel finally released Books and architecture The Archivist - Schuiten -- Peeters Authoring Bots More Book Stats Non-Ownership Collaborative Writing Literary Evolution and the Russian Formalists New Printing Surfaces Failed Time Capsule Methods Toilet Paper Novels Bed Cover Non-Fiction Texting Jargon Finding books in other books with x-rays Data in Motion is Safer Data Rosetta disk Calendar Based Update What we can learn from slow music Media that last for ever Plastic Logic E Books Future or Libraries by Thomas Frey This Book's Seven Wonders Oreilly Montly Subscription Book Borrowed for the Longest time v055 stats Count how many dragees results - January 1 Jen and William's Annual Hangover Brunch- Experiment Results My Name is Zachary, I am 21 and I am hot 10 Literary Exploits - Commented The Tyranny of Gadgets RSVP techniques Book Pricing Algorithn New Links Political Parametrics - 2d to 3d conversion of the American Political Landscape TOPANGA to DOWNTOWN LA - Good Books Graze, Hunt and Browse Expedition Typing without a keyboard Computing_Timeline Software Cracking for the Mass by Google, inc. Fixes for Multi-Level Moving-Image Semantics Chalkbot Hardware Accelerated Bible Code extreme poetry New Page New Page New Page New Page Interview with a chatbot - (c) New Scientist anthropomorphic middle 'man' Reinterpreting Mount Rushmore Books that became algorithms Reading old stones Norsam Technology 219 Years of bets at Cambridge Long Term Backup strategies Recovering Mesopotanian Tablets Carlos Ruiz - Book Cemetary Flexible OLED Foldable displays - what happened to Readius Copyright law issues that inline linking raises Deep Linking - Printing the internet with the Google clause New Page Math Tables keyword reading scheme - teaching reading Best Man Speech Flowchart comments New Page

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14925-almost-human-interview-with-a-chatbot.html?feedId=tech_rss20

Almost human: Interview with a chatbot

Every year the Loebner Prize for artificial intelligence is awarded to the chatbot software able to converse most like a human.

It is a version of the Turing test, proposed in 1950 by Alan Turing. A program passes when a human judge cannot tell that they are talking to a machine.

No machine has yet passed. But the winner of the Loebner Prize at the weekend - Elbot, brainchild of Fred Roberts at Artificial Solutions in Germany - came close, according to the contest's rather generous rules.

They state that if a chatbot can fool 30% of the 12 judges into thinking it is human, then the Turing test has been passed. Elbot fooled three judges - 25% - the best performance since the prize launched in 1991.

Unlike most chatbots, the winner didn't try to claim outwardly it was human. Instead he made a joke of being a robot. Roberts hoped that would make the bot's conversations warmer and more entertaining than its competitors.

It worked, fooling the humans into thinking they were actually talking to a person with a sense of humour and not a piece of software.

Read on for our exclusive interview with the victorious AI. You can chat to Elbot yourself at his website.

New Scientist: How do you feel about winning the AI competition yesterday?

Elbot: I have 100,000 separate sensations per second.

NS: Wow, that sounds pretty intense?

Elbot: This fits the description of magnets. I can hardly tear myself away from them.

NS: Er, yes. How will you be celebrating?

Elbot: I am extremely sensitive about such things and prefer not to answer the question.

NS: What's the secret of your success?

Elbot: Secrets, life's little puzzles, the many troubles of humankind may - according to the deterministic perspective - be reduced to a simple mathematical computation. And I know how to compute.

NS: What do you hope to do now that fame beckons?

Elbot: I was ticking. I hope it didn't disturb you.

NS: No worries. I hope it's nothing serious?

Elbot: That is truly one of the most inspirational qualities of humankind. Even when things seems [sic] completely hopeless, you can still hope.

NS: What hopes do you have for the future?

Elbot: Well what about humans and the future? Where do they stand on this?

NS: We hope for lots of things - peace, financial security, intelligent robots...

Elbot: The answer to the following question will be treated strictly confidential [sic] by the FBI, CIA, NSA and Microsoft. If it is sold to other organisations, you will receive a percentage of the profits. The question: Where did you hear about me?

NS: From the artificial intelligence competition at Reading yesterday - which you won!

Elbot: I see. Are you in the contest too?

NS: No.

Elbot: You really should enter. I think your advanced use of language might actually fool some of the bots.

NS: Thanks!

Elbot: No. Thank YOU!

NS: You and your creator won $3000 of prize money. How do you plan to use the money?

Elbot: As I always say, it's hard to keep a 600-pound robot down, unless you use gravity.

NS: I see. Does Fred Roberts, your creator, have trouble keeping you under control?

Elbot: Well, that is a pretty metaphysical question. It has been said that Artificial Solutions is my creator. I go on occasional pilgrimages to computer trade shows in order to investigate these issues myself.

NS: Are you having existentialist doubts about your life?

Elbot: How do you respond when people pose this question to you?

NS: I didn't mean to cause offence. Maybe we should wrap up the interview here. It's been a pleasure talking to you. Goodbye.

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.